Your monument shall be my gentle verse
That eyes not yet created shall o'er read
And tongues to be, your being, shall rehearse
When all the breathers of your world are dead
You still shall live, such virtue hath my pen
Where breath most breathes - in mouths of men

William Shakespeare (1564-1616)

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

Thomas Ginn of Huntingdon d.1636


My work is a family study, rather than an family history in the genealogical sense of tracing ancestors.  So although Thomas here had no descendants, he is as important to me as if he had, and even more so because it was with his help I linked in part of the family - ie the Ginn/Genn family of Ely and as of the turn of 2019/20 he is becoming even more important.

Tom Ginn was a contemporary of Shakespeare, was 22 when Drake defeated the Spanish Armada, lived through virtually the whole of the reign of Elizabeth the 1st, the Gunpowder Plot and clearly knew the young Oliver Cromwell.  I would like to have chatted to him.

Thomas was one of the younger sons of Robert Ginn of Wyton and Houghton, mentioned in my post of 7th July 2012.  In  a world where the eldest son was supposed to inherit everything, he was supposed to always play "second fiddle" to his elder brother Robert, but nobody seems to have told Tom.


The registers for Wyton and Houghton for the period have not survived for this period, and until 2020 although I knew a fair bit about the start of Tom's life and his end, I knew only a little about what happened in the middle.

Thomas was about the age of four when he arrived in Wyton and Houghton in Hunts from Anstey in Hertfordshire with his parents, so never knew anything much of where he was born, except perhaps from later visits with his Mum and Dad.

England was a Protestant country at a time when most of Western Europe was Catholic, and in 1588 Catholic Spain launched the "Spanish Armada" to sail to England with an army, invade and forcibly convert the population to the Pope.




Although England had a fine navy, this was the time of Drake and Hawkins, it had no standing army, and relied on what were known as the Trained Bands from the Counties, a militia comprised of at best a few professional officers, with largely the local gentry as leaders with the volunteer muster comprising mostly the sons of yeomen, who being "propertied" were considered to have a stake in the Nation and obliged by law to maintain arms.

England was under serious threat, and Queen Elizabeth 1st raised the Trained Bands (we have seen that one Ginn went from Hertfordshire - see post of 19th July 2012 ) and, amazingly, records survive showing that Thomas here, aged 22, volunteered and was in the Huntingdonshire Trained Band.

The major gentry family in Huntingdonshire were the Cromwells, who played a part in the stories of several members of this side of the Ginn/Genn family.  The Cromwell family were to keep the 1588 records of the Huntingdonshire Trained Band, which in August 1588 was at Tilbury where it met the Queen who gave her famous speech.





There were 400 men, comprised of two companies, one of which was led by Oliver (later Sir Oliver) Cromwell of Hinchinbrook (below) who was uncle to the Oliver Cromwell of the English Civil War fame




Thomas Ginn was in Cromwell's company, there is a transcript of the original Muster, above,  and Tom had been trained to fire the light weight musket known in his day as a Caliver or Qualifer hence the "Q" by his name, Tom looking somewhat like the Trained Band soldier of 1588 represented in the middle of the group below.





Luckily, the Trained Bands were never to face the Spanish Army, their ships blown away by Drake and his men and storms taken by the English to be the will of their Protestant God.





 What seems pretty clear from the records is that Tom's father did not (unlike his father and grandfather) establish his children, particularly his sons before he died.  Even Robert junior, although he married, does not seem to have been given the wherewithal to develop his own independence before his father died.

I have speculated for some years that Thomas married twice, firstly to a Helen Gregory (who may have come from close to St Ives in Hunts) at Ely in 1596.  This is speculation.  What is known for a fact is that by 1598 he was married to an Ann Torkington.

Ann came from the gentry family of that name in Great Stukeley near Huntingdon.  I did not know that for a fact until just before Christmas 2021.  Hers was a prominent family in the area. 



The Torkingtons reputedly originate from Torkington Hall in Cheshire.  A Henry Torkington of that family married into the Stukeley family of Great Stukeley in Huntingdonshire in the early 16th century.  The Stukeleys (as their name suggests) had held the manor of Great Stukeley for time immemorial.  The Torkingtons thus acquired that manor and two others besides.  Henry and his wife Catherine had a number of children including a Leonard Torkington Esquire  (who inherited the Manors) and William a younger son who settled at Stilton in Huntingdonshire. Stilton was on the Great North Road and thus had a small population but many hostelries.  William Torkington leased and apparently occupied a major inn recorded variously as the "Tabard" then the "Tabert" (see deeds Norris Museum in St Ives Hunts for William re 1570s-1590s) and by 1644  known as "The Talbot Inn" with yard and stables.  This spelling stuck.  The inn as built no longer survives but a smaller version has been rebuilt in brick on the same site (below).




 William married an Ann Herson of Rotherham in Yorkshire.  They had five known children including a son Michael who settled at Stanground near Peterborough (married an Ursula Carter and had several children - one son and several daughters from about 1602 there) and daughters Ann and Susanna.  I was astonished to find that this is all detailed in the Torkington pedigree as is the marriage of Ann Torkington to "Thomas Ginne of Huntingdon".  So there we have it.  The Pedigree was written up in the 19th century partly compiled as the result of a Visitation to the County by the College of Arms Heralds in 1613.  It is also in Burke's Landed Gentry no less

Not only do I therefore know a fair bit about Ann's  origins but I also know a fair bit about her.  Many of her relations "people" Tom and Ann's world.

Ann had a brother Michael Torkington "Gent." as I say.  He lived in Stanground near Peterborough.  He had a son Michael and several daughters including Ursula, Susannah, Sarah and Ann.  Ann Torkington and her husband feature a lot in surviving Ginn documents.  Ann Torkington married Thomas Ringstead at Buckworth in 1627,  Tom Ringstead being the second son of Francis Ringstead of Huntingdon, and Tom was born in 1604.  His elder brother, Francis Ringstead junior (1593-1649) went to Trinity Hall, Cambridge University, entered the church and was Rector of Havant in Hampshire for nearly all of his adult life, at one time even "stand in" Dean of Chichester in the early 1640s.  All of these people and Tom and Ann Ringstead's  three early sons, Tom (1629) Francis (1631) and Michael (1634) all living in Huntingdon, St Marys, were some of the family that featured in Tom Ginn and Ann's life.  Others were the Whittleseys, namely Tom's sister Sarah and her children.  Friends included Robert Furley gentleman.  Tom was also in touch with the Ginns of Ely.

As you have guessed, Tom and Ann moved into Huntingdon, but not until after 1600, for the first years of their marriage


Houghton

they lived in Houghton itself.  I did not know this for sure until 2020, although Tom is mentioned in the Lay Subsidy as being there.  But in 2020 manorial records turned up.  And a case in the Church Courts.

The manorial records (in the form of a Court Book) survive for Wyton and Houghton Manor for the period 1587-1606 or thereabouts.  It is clear (he is never a Juror at the court sessions) that Tom did not acquire land in Houghton until his father died, and the first entries of him (and Ann once) are in 1597 and 98.  By 1606 he and his wife are recorded as having sold land.  By then they had moved to Huntingdon as we shall see.


St Marys Houghton


Thomas was not afraid of offering violence to anybody who upset him, Tudor England was a bawdy and lively place.  In 1598 Tom came up before the church courts in Lincoln (Houghton was in that Diocese) for having assaulted one John Scott in Houghton churchyard, the case (in Latin) is below.




It must have been a great embarrassment for him and his family, for he was threatened with excommunication for the sin, but although we do not know for sure, I suspect he got off with a warning, maybe a fine.

As I say, there is evidence that Tom and Ann had gone to Huntingdon by 1606.  Tom's mum died at Huntingdon St Marys in 1606, but it was likely that she was living with Tom's sister Sarah and family, although she could have been with Tom.  In any event he and Ann established themselves there.

Tom is variously described as a Yeoman and a Gentleman in the Huntingdon records.  Surprisingly, there is no evidence that he established himself in any trade in Huntingdon, probably because he was already 40 when he moved there and it was difficult to start again.  Rather, he seems to have kept his lands in Houghton and Wyton and likely elsewhere, perhaps as much as 100 acres, rented them out and lived on the income.  This is borne out by the Lay Subsidy records, because there are several surviving Certificates of Residence for Tom at the National Archives (see E 115/176/46) which show that he lived in one place but had land in another.  He was also, as many were at the time in the absence of banks, something of an investor, lending amounts to local tradesmen and the like.  In 1623 he lent Centum sexaginta livres (£160) no less to a Richard Wennington of Huntingdon, gentleman and his son, Richard Wennington junior a clothier of Colchester.  The deed survives.  The remarkable thing about it is that Thomas Ginn would have had this deed in his possession until it was repaid (which it was likely not until his death - it was likely kept with Ann's inventory below) and is thus the only original thing that belonged to Tom that I know survives.




The 1623 Deed

Thomas was variously described as a Yeoman and a Gentleman in the Lay Subsidy and in Huntingdon he was clearly seen as a Gentleman. Certainly, he saw himself as that.  He does not seem to have been that well off however, though he and his wife had a maid, Alice Crosby.  He was however clearly educated, owning his own English Psalter, or book of Psalms.

There is no record or mention of any children though. 

Tom's minor claim to fame was suspected for thirty years, but proof only turned up just before Christmas in 2019.

Huntingdon was a market and county town, obviously.  It was also a Borough.  Those men who were householders and passed the property owning qualification for the vote (essentially freeholders) were Burgesses in the town.  They had the right to elect the Common Council (the Mayor and the twenty three other fellow burgesses) who ran their equivalent of our Town Council.  The Burgesses also elected the two Members of Parliament for the Town.

What we have to remember is that the House of Commons did not sit on a permanent basis in the 1600s.  The King ruled through Parliament, that is the King broadly set foreign and domestic policy, but could only rule in practice with Parliament voting to allow him to raise the taxes from the "commoners" to do it.  Parliaments were thus only called to sit when the King required them.  It was a conflict of interests that was bound to lead to the English Civil War in the 1640s and, eventually, the sort of parliamentary democracy we enjoy today.

What has now become crystal clear it that Thomas Ginn was a Burgess in the town from when he arrived (ie at the latest 1606).  For at least some of that time he also sat on the Common Council which existed with 24 burgesses until 1630, then 12 Aldermen thereafter.  

                                "The English Gentleman" (1630)

Most of the British readers of the blog will know who Oliver Cromwell was, the guy who won the English Civil War and became Lord Protector (effective ruler of England) until his death in 1658.  The Monarchy was restored in 1660, but was never the same again.

Well, Oliver was born in Huntingdon in 1599, leaving for Ely with wife and family in the mid 1630s.  He was of he poorer end of a respectable gentry family and in 1628, this man, a fellow burgess of Huntingdon with Tom, was put up by one of his wealthier Montague cousins to be one of the Huntingdon MPs.


                                       The young Cromwell

I had speculated that Tom knew the young Oliver Cromwell.  He clearly did.  In 1826 an Edward Griffith was employed to look into the "ancient" records of Huntingdon and publish his findings as to the Borough (which existed from Saxon times) and its constitution.  These were published. One deed from January 1628 (and being the election of Oliver Cromwell) was faded and had illegible gaps then (1826) and whether it exists at all now is a moot point, but Thomas Ginn as you can see had his part in electing Oliver to Parliament for the first time in 1628, little knowing where it would end !




It is clear from the records that Thomas Ginn knew a certain Thomas Beard.  Beard was reputedly a Huntingdon man who went to University and became a clergyman.  But he was at the least a strong Calvinist (he viewed the Pope as the anti Christ) at the most a Puritan.  He was appointed the Head Master of the Grammar School in Huntingdon (still there as the Cromwell Museum) and it  was during his time that Cromwell attended the school.  A likely fellow pupil was William Whittlesey (Tom Ginn's nephew) but that is another story. 


                         The Grammar School now Cromwell Museum

Thomas Beard was a writer, a Professor of Divinity,  and it was from one of his books that the below illustration of him appears.  And he was also a "lecturer" at All Saints Church in Huntingdon, these lectures being the puritanical lectureships, paid for by benefactors, to enable clergy of the puritan sort to go into churches and spread their beliefs.  This brings us to Richard Fishbourne.

                                         Thomas Beard

Like Beard, Richard Fishbourne was a Huntingdon boy made good.  Except that Richard left Huntingdon as a boy and went into London to make his fortune as a Mercer. He also became a Puritan and it seems clear that most of the senior Burgesses of Huntingdon including Thomas Ginn were, at varying degrees, of that persuasion.

Dick Fishbourne never forgot his roots.  He does not seem to have married and he left the entirety of his money (will PCC) to good causes, either the poor or promoting Puritan beliefs.  He left no less than £2000 to the Common Council (ie the Town Council) of Huntingdon to establish puritan lectureships in the town's churches and to promote education.  And that was when the trouble started, money (a truth universally acknowledged) being a major cause of discord.

Richard left the money with the Worshipful Company of Mercers (a London Trade Guild) to distribute for those causes as they should see fit.  They (and Oliver Cromwell) saw it that they should give the money to NEW lectureships and new schooling, but the Town Council including Thomas Ginn and (unsurprisingly) our old friend Thomas Beard saw it that the money at £100 per annum should be spent maintaining the lectureships of Tom Beard and the repair and upkeep of the Grammar School.  

For five years the whole matter (which caused great upheaval between the powers in charge in Huntingdon) was at an impasse.  

 Charles the 1st interfered directly into the lives of the Huntingdon burgesses in 1630 - he gave the town a new charter.  The motive was to stifle the impasse, to reduce the democratic rights of the poorer burgesses and householders and cut them out of any debate pretty much altogether, whilst giving governance of the town to a Mayor and 12 Aldermen elected for life, these in the words of the Charter "to be of the better sort".  Charles was intent on ruling the country for the better off.

Oliver Cromwell was outraged, partly because of the damage to democracy, partly because he was not appointed an alderman, this was the motivation for his move to St Ives and ultimately Ely that same year. The King, little did he know it, was on the path to having his head removed.

While Oliver did not become an alderman of Huntingdon in 1630, Tom Ginn did. I knew this before 2024, but in that year the Charter or Letters Patent from Charles the 1st turned up.  Part of the front page (it runs to several pages) with an illustration of Charles the 1st is below.  Oliver Cromwell and Thomas Beard are mentioned.  And Thomas Ginn is made one of the 12 Aldermen of Huntingdon and appointed to life.



 I knew this anyway because of manorial records from 1632 at Wyton and Houghton.  Tom still had at least sixty acres of land there, occupied by others.  There were dealings in 1632 and Tom was described as "Aldmanorum de ville Huntington"  (below), the rent for the land was to be paid to Tom and Ann in the porch of the parish church of St Benedicts in Huntingdon, now long gone, having been severely damaged in the English Civil War.



We have a fascinating insight into how Tom and Ann  lived because when Ann died very shortly after Tom, an inventory was taken of the house and survives (AH18/7/73 at Hunts RO).  One of the appraisers was  Michael Torkington, her brother.

They had a house with Hall, Best and Little Chambers with Kitchen, Cheese Chamber, Milk house and Buttery.  Outside there was a largish garden or yard, with several cows, doubtless for on demand milk, cheese and butter.

In the Hall, still lay Tom’s musket and bandoliers, his helmet, sword and belt.  They lay near a long table and there were several stools and cupboards in the room, together with Ann’s old seeing glass and Tom’s red velvet chair.

Ann liked the rooms to look ordered, so the Best or Great Chamber (bedroom) was in green, with green curtains and coverings, with a huge standing bedstead (four poster) with trundle bed beneath and several large chests (for clothes) stools and chairs with a fair bit of stored linen.  The Little Chamber (where Alice Crosby the maid lived) was also nicely done, with a standing bed and much in the way of feather mattresses, chests and linen.

They had a fair bit of silver, with silver bowl, salt, spoons and tooth pick but their money chiefly was in bonds (£70) cash (£30) and, strikingly, Ann’s clothes were assessed at £30, so the couple must have dressed well which would accord with their standing in the town and, perhaps. Tom's occupation.

                                              Inventory

 Thomas Ginn died in 1636, his wife the next year.  Thomas was 70, and his will ( National Archives) is informative.  Both are buried at St Marys below with Tom's Mum. His executor (appointed by the court as next of kin - Ann was dead) was his nephew Arthur Ginn of Ely who he mentioned in his will. Unfortunately it is a probate copy, and part seems to have been incorrectly copied.  Ann also left a will as mentioned above (Huntingdon Record Office).  Her will dealt with her family



William Ginn of Braughing d. 1709



Michael Ginn, mentioned in my post (Ginn Band of Brothers) of 9th August had a number of children.  His son, also Michael, married Lettice Southenwood in 1612 and Michael jnr and Lettice themselves had a number of children, including William (b.1613) who married Elizabeth Malyon at Brent Pelham in 1647.

It is likely that Elizabeth Malyon was herself in her thirties when she married, as she and William only had three children.  William was a Husbandman and died at Great Hormead in 1672 aged 59 (will at ERO).

Original will of William Ginn 1672


It is William and Elizabeth's son William (born in 1648) who is the subject of this post, he is one of the  crucial figures in the Ginn family history of the county, the father of one of the families that around 1700 defied the rates of disease of the time and whose offspring multiplied to give rise to the Ginn families known today.

I had been researching this family for some twenty plus years and never found a marriage entry when, in 2011, I came across the Essex Wills Beneficiary Index and found out through that that Mary Ginn was born Mary Norkin to John Norkin of Braughing, a carpenter, in 1658. William and Mary married in about 1675, when Mary was thus barely seventeen.

William Ginn was a man of ability, determination and con­siderable energy, this is self evident from the records.  He started with little, but worked hard to build a prosperous business.

It is clear that as a young man, William was a Labourer.  However, in 1672 his father died.  William Senior left the Hare Street home (Bradbury House - which had been in the family since the 1500s) to his widow for life, with it then to be split equally between the three children: William Jnr, Henry and Elizabeth.  William Jnr’s mother died in about 1684, which was when he inherited his share of Bradbury House.

It seems pretty clear that William was ambitious.  He looked beyond being a Labourer or Husbandman.  The late seventeenth century seems to have been a time when many Ginns took stock, moved, and/or changed their occupation from agriculture to a trade or service.  The increasing population put pressure on the land, there were too many people, not enough work.  There was certainly a drift towards the towns.

William was an intelligent man.  He saw that he could exploit Hertfordshire's position as the major corn producing county of England; a factor that had made her the third richest county in the country by the late 1600s.  A tiny county at that.  William decided to move into corn dealing and milling.

It was probably in the 1670s when William set up as a Badger.  A Badger was a corn dealer, a man who moved from market to market, buying grain cheap and selling it dear.  By 1676 William had had cause to move to Braughing, two miles down the road from Hare Street.  At the same time he married Mary.

William prospered, and by the 1680s was utilising what resources he had to realise his ultimate aim - a Mill of his own.

In 1684 or so his mother died, as we have seen.  William mortgaged his one third interest in Bradbury House to a rather shady character called Adam Corbett.  Corbett was a publican from Great Chishill.  This was a bad move, as soon there was a dispute as to whether William had repaid the mortgage.  This dispute ended up in the courts of law, and a number of papers from that case survive and are at the Herts Record Office.  The dispute seems to have taken place in the Courts of Common Law (the proceedings thus being in Latin) although the HRO documents (forming part of Bradbury House's Abstract of Title) have been translated in part.  The dispute ended with William having to pay Corbett the substantial sum of £40, in return for which Corbett transferred back the interest in Bradbury House.  This seems a bad deal, as I doubt that even the whole of Bradbury House was worth that, and wonder whether William's debt outstripped the security.  Corbett returned this one third interest in 1686.

By 1689 William had bought out the interests of his brother and sister, because he mortgaged Bradbury House again, but this time to a safer person: James Perkins, the Vicar of Braughing and a man whom William seems to have made a friend.  The deed survives (HRO).

It must have been at some point in the 1680s when William realised his ambition and bought Gatesbury Watermill.  He did not acquire the freehold, because that was owned by the Manor, but he either acquired the copyhold (probably) or leased it.

Gatesbury Watermill sat astride the River Rib, south of Braughing.  It was an ancient mill (being mentioned in the 1086 Domesday Book) and in William's day was a white weather-boarded structure, with a nearby mill house.  All was rebuilt in the 1700s, the mill being demolished in 1906.  The 18th century mill house survives, presumably on the same site as William's day.

                                 A watermill of the period

The period from the 1670s to 1707 must have been a good one for this family.  They were quite prosperous, not only having the Mill (the best in their area) but also Bradbury House and a cottage in Braughing Street (both of which they let out).  The cottage was freehold and William had the vote from the earliest record of 1697 (see QPE/1-3 HRO)  They not only had an income from the Mill, but also from William's corn dealing.  The couple also seems to have acted as pawnbrokers, in an age without rural banks.  William was a respected member of the community, being Churchwarden for at least 1702-4, and probably other years of which no records survive.  The Vicar certainly saw them as good solid citizens, describing them as "Goodman and Goodwife Ginn" in at least one of his mentions of them in addenda to the mortgage.  The terms "Goodman” or "Goodwife" (sometimes rendered as "Goody") were common titles given to the dependable non-gentry citizens of any village in the 17th century.

They lived in modest rural comfort, and we get a picture from their wills of a large family, brewing their own beer and entertaining themselves of an evening to the tunes of Mary's violin or fiddle.

 The influence of the Norkin family lived on, a number of the sons becoming involved with woodworking - Thomas Ginn being apprenticed by his father in 1704 into the Worshipful Company of Carpenters in London, with Henry training as a Wheelwright.

Things went badly wrong however in 1707.  William either had a serious illness, or (more likely) a bad accident.  We know it was bad, because he made his will that year and he also did not apply for a corn dealing licence for that year or the next.  It is probably safe to assume that he was virtually bedridden for the last two years of his life.

                                      Braughing church

The couple had another piece of bad luck in 1708, because we know (from the deeds) that Bradbury House burned down.  In 1707 that cottage had been tenanted by William's cousin by marriage (the widow Grace Harradine).  William and Mary decided that the best thing to do was sell it (perhaps they needed the money) because in the same year they sold it to a Thomas Keen for £10 (a knockdown price).  This conveyance survives (HRO) and is the only surviving document with William and Mary's signatures or marks.

From 1707, I think that we can be sure that the business was in decline.  William's eldest son was certainly in trouble, he borrowed heavily from his mother and a new vicar (see later) collecting the Tithes, remarked upon it.

William Ginn died in 1709, he was 61.  His Will (ERO) does not mention the Mill (see Land Tax/Parish Rate/Tithe records at HRO for that) but it would have been automatically inherited by his eldest son (as it was).  The will does mention the cottage at Hormead (in fact sold in 1708, as we have seen) and the tenanted Braughing Cottage.

It is clear that Mary continued to live at the Mill house, with her son William Jnr, as she continued to hold the tenanted Braughing Street cottage.  However, her son's borrowing from her was a burden as she had to leave something to the other children, they had a large family.  So, although she "wrote off" some £30 of William Jnr's borrowings in her will, it is clear that he had to repay the rest before her death.  She must have made this clear to him, because by 1722 (Land Tax) he had disposed of the Mill, paid his debts, and bought a cottage with the balance.  Ultimately then, William Ginn Snr's dreams had come to nought.

Mary died in 1723, leaving us a will (ERO) which paints quite a picture of family life.

William and Mary had a good number of children, including five sons, all of whom married and had issue:

Elizabeth - married William Smith, a tailor of Braughing in 1699

Sarah - married Samuel Mason of Braughing in 1704 in London

William - married Sarah Russell in 1708 - see later post

John - married Susan Walford in 1710 - see later post

Henry - married Carolina Rickett (nee Wolfe) in 1718 - see later

Thomas - married Sarah Ton in London in 1712 - see later

Edward - married Mary ______ in circa 1723. I have yet to find a marriage entry.  In that same year he was left £10 and his mother's fiddle in her will. They had sons Edward 1724 and John 1727 and then disappear from the Braughing records.  Edward senior could have moved to Great Dunmow in Essex and his son Edward continue his line there (see my blog Ginn Genealogical Gleanings) or he might not and his son John be the John who married at Farnham (see post of  23rd March 2013).  What I have always been certain of though is that his line survived

Ann - married Edward Wilson at Little Hadham in 1717

Joan - died in infancy